Research

The impacts of the flood event in September 2024 demonstrated that building development in Lower Austria is not risk-adapted. New construction, additions, and building conversions in flood affected areas continuously increase the damage potential. Existing spatial planning regulations allow building land uses in potential flood-plains. In view of the initial estimate of damage amounts (€ 700 million for private households), it is clear that risk-based planning has not yet found its way into spatial planning and building law procedures - i.e. planning practice. Spatial planning restrictions for hazard areas have been in place in Lower Austria for decades, but the action plan of the Austrian Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change emphasizes that further regulatory improvements in planning law should be under-taken to prevent natural hazards and adapt to climate change. The event in September 2024 also shows that there is not a regulatory deficit per se, but that the available hazard information and climate change-related dynamics in hazard frequencies and characteristics are not optimally integrated into spatial development - particularly at municipal level. Two central questions for RiskPlan can be derived from this: (i) Which legal adjustments in spatial planning and building law can promote risk-based planning and thus long-term adaptation? (ii) How can a professionally sound advisory service be organized that allows municipalities to make risk-based decisions regarding flood adaptation in spatial planning and building law? Methodologically, RiskPlan is based on an explorative approach. The legal analysis builds on a comparison of regulations in the federal states. The development of procedurally embedded advisory services is carried out in a transdisciplinary approach together with representatives of the authorities and planning consultants.

The RESET.Go eGen innovation laboratory and the RESET lighthouse project focus on testing the energy transition in rural areas with a more digital and adaptive approach. A web-based planning methodology is made available to the public and calculates optimal energy technologies, their capacities and sector-coupled operations as well as renovation and flexibility potentials. In real-world implementation, existing and newly implemented (measurement) infrastructures are embedded in a homogenising data architecture in order to ideally regulate analyses and optimisations of energy technologies and consumers. Regional consumers are networked with each other across various disciplines through the innovation laboratory and have the opportunity to optimally create decentralised energy networks, to participate financially in regional energy technologies and to actively contribute to the energy status.

ENERGY4ALL aims at developing energy configurations as a common pool resource, testing thecommunity dimension in the design and implementation of emergent Positive Energy Districts (PED)and Energy Communities (EC). The project explores an inclusive governance model throughsupportive toolboxes for the design and implementation of participatory energy governance andreplicable pathways for PEDs/ECs.The project operates with an open definition of EC, including both as a set of households producingand consuming energy, as well as users of a common public resource to increase energy efficiency.ENERGY4ALL conceptualises ECs as featuring three constitutive elements in mutual relationship:resource, community and governance. These elements are explored in different cases within the fourpilot cases, Stavanger (Norway), Styria (Austria), Budapest (Hungary) and Rome (Italy), with coverageof various characteristics including urban and industrial sites, territorial scales from household todistrict, and multi-stakeholder involvement of public authorities, private enterprises, researchinstitutions and local citizen groups.